Primary sources first
Every factual or legal claim in an article is checked against a primary source — an
Indian statute, an RBI/FEMA circular, or the relevant country's official authority (a
government department, tax authority, or the Hague Conference's own Apostille Convention
text) — rather than against another website's explanation of that source.
Legal-accuracy review before publishing
A credentialed legal reviewer checks each cited claim against its primary source before
an article is published. Any claim that cannot be traced to a primary source is cut or
flagged for further research rather than published with a vague hedge.
No invented facts, statistics, or testimonials
This platform never fabricates client outcomes, satisfaction statistics, "as featured
in" claims, or testimonials. Every trust signal on this site is real and checkable.
Structure every article the same way
Every article carries a Quick-Answer summary, a table of contents built from its own
headings, an author/reviewer byline naming who actually reviewed it, and — where
applicable — an FAQ section whose questions are identical to what appears in its
structured data (no schema/content mismatch).
Reviewer credit, never a solicitation
A reviewer byline credits who reviewed an article's legal accuracy. It never functions
as an advertisement or a call to book a consultation with that reviewer's practice.
Corrections are logged publicly
When a legal-accuracy-relevant correction is made to a published article, it is recorded
on our Corrections page rather than edited silently.
